judicial review

Forgive me for sounding alarmist here, but given the rationale used to initiate such a blatant blanket-trampling of civil rights, are we looking at the potential future of "everytown" America?

"We are still waiting for Barack Obama to be required to devote time to having his hair done." - Egalia at TGW

Ah, if only John Edwards had beaten Hillary instead of Barack Obama; that would leave one less issue with which to be upset about.

To accompany Serr8d’s post, check out this offering from Nathan of AFP.
Some of you have asked “what’s this Heller case that the Supreme Court is scheduled to rule upon this week?” Simply put, this case is about personal liberty. The 1939 US v. Miller decision was the last attempt at judicial review of the second [...]

I found Spring Hill Alderman Jonathan Duda’s (May 21) letter to the editor disturbing.

<

Let’s mix a gun control debate with a semantic debate, and see what happens. At issue here: Whether a pro-gun ruling in Heller would recognize a “new” Constitutional right.

State Senator Joe Haynes (Democrat from Nashville) issued a press release today calling the Senators sponsoring SJR-127 “extremists.” He also called the senators “out of touch with the opinion of a majority of Tennesseans.” Hmmm.

State Senator Joe Haynes (Democrat from Nashville) issued a press release today calling the Senators sponsoring SJR-127 "extremists." He also called the senators "out of touch with the opinion of a majority of Tennesseans." Hmmm.