supreme court justices

The American Courthouse blog comments on Tennessee's Potemkin Judicial "Elections", in response to Tom Humphrey's story in yesterday's Knoxville News Sentinel headlined "

Tom Humphrey reports on what may be the last year for judicial retention elections:

KAG lets us in on how the Supremes used digital access to the founding documents to decide a recent landmark gun rights case:

Egalia has a list of demands from the New York chapter of NOW (the same group of aging feminists who accused Ted Kennedy of betrayal for supporting Obama)...most of which defy all logic or reality.

Bill Hobbs points to a survey showing a surprising number of people who think that the shenanigans that surround elective politics should extend to the Supreme Court:

Tennessee voters going to the polls next month may be surprised to find that, in addition to congressional and state legislative race primaries they are asked to vote in a handful of judicial races. Well, not really "races," but "retention elections" for a handful of appointed state Supreme Court and appellate court judges.

Supreme Court Treason

Puerto Rico, which has 55 delegates up for grabs even though they can't vote in the general election, is opening their polls right about now.

Hillary Clinton is in Puerto Rico, where she will celebrate what will likely be her last victory.